<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazing Randy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phoener.com/amazing-randy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phoener.com/amazing-randy/</link>
	<description>of the Phoenix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:45:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title><img class='wavatar' src='http://phoener.com/wp-content/cache/wavatars/b1626d6271c388357.png' width='40' height='40' alt='Wavatar' />By:  Gayle</title>
		<link>http://phoener.com/amazing-randy/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator><img class='wavatar' src='http://phoener.com/wp-content/cache/wavatars/b1626d6271c388357.png' width='40' height='40' alt='Wavatar' /> Gayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phoener.com/?p=27#comment-9</guid>
		<description>One can&#039;t know unless one accepts that there is knowledge.

Where did that come from?

I need more coffee.

I think one of the greatest disservices that those like The Not-So-Amazing Randy inflict upon us is to discredit &quot;imagination&quot;.  As in: &quot;It&#039;s all in their imagination&quot;.

Well,  Duh.  Nothing is real which was not first imagined, after all.  Even when we are perceiving what we acknowledge as physical reality, that manifestation first developed in thought.  Our thought?  Someone else&#039;s thought?  It doesn&#039;t really matter in the long run.  We still perceive it, and ergo our own &quot;imaginations&quot; have agreed to the existence of the form.

Randy denies the proof and debunks the invention, not because it&#039;s all in someone else&#039;s imagination ... but because he has no imagination of his own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One can&#8217;t know unless one accepts that there is knowledge.</p>
<p>Where did that come from?</p>
<p>I need more coffee.</p>
<p>I think one of the greatest disservices that those like The Not-So-Amazing Randy inflict upon us is to discredit &#8220;imagination&#8221;.  As in: &#8220;It&#8217;s all in their imagination&#8221;.</p>
<p>Well,  Duh.  Nothing is real which was not first imagined, after all.  Even when we are perceiving what we acknowledge as physical reality, that manifestation first developed in thought.  Our thought?  Someone else&#8217;s thought?  It doesn&#8217;t really matter in the long run.  We still perceive it, and ergo our own &#8220;imaginations&#8221; have agreed to the existence of the form.</p>
<p>Randy denies the proof and debunks the invention, not because it&#8217;s all in someone else&#8217;s imagination &#8230; but because he has no imagination of his own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
